Since 50-s, it is devoted to the most complicated aspect of the correlation problem between myth and literature raised by literary theory.
keyword:
Russian literary poetry mythical poetic word text
Article Body:
Interpretation of the mythical text as a possible way to judge the definition of literature shares the fundamental features of the 70-s Russian post-structuralism at the crossroads of several paradigms of the humanities, Myth criticism is the practical use of some methodological direction of contemporary linguistics, semiotics, cultural research Approach to this text is not deep in traditional literary history It helps to describe the level of meaning. Nonetheless, some features of this method seem strange and dubious, primarily because it selects an innovative interpretation method. That is why the criticism of myths has become very useful for the scholars of many Russian literature, with the intention of leaving an outdated analysis plan. Famous representatives of myths are (eg Erzy Faryno, Wolf Schmid, Aage Hansen-Love, Igor Smirnov, Mikhail Weiskopf) and Russia (Vladimir - Topolov, the predecessor of the movement, some scholars of the youngest generation - Goncharov In my opinion, we need to grasp the whole mythological problem in historical, typological and practical aspects, which is the common purpose of the first part.
The tendency of such criticism is rich in different practical analyzes of singular text, but to the rigorous theoretical concept which can form all the foundations, in this sense, very eclectic from the outset So it helps to examine the history of method development. The first part of my work is dedicated to the historical investigation of methodology and its evolution.
In the second part, we will present an attempt to put the theoretical structure into practical use for concrete materials. For this procedure I chose the materials of the Soviet literature in twenties and early thirties. The regularity of my choice is very special type in the early Soviet culture that revived some aged models very aggressively in contemporary context As it is known, the poetry of this period Is a more rare purpose of literary research on the so-called socialist realism of 30-40-s. In the second part of the article, we decide to investigate the basic mythical level, the lowest of the text, or more precisely the text, including key motives and the universal structure of the plot
Let me list the subjects of my interpretation. There is a proletarian poem of 20-s, fragmentary of 30-s; a long poem by Alexander Tvardovsky "Land of Muravia"; a short story by Andrei Platonov and a poem by novel by llya Selvinsky "PUSHTORG". I tried to organize this material type-wise in order to encompass all the basic spheres in which myth elements work. The purpose of my research is to emphasize the basic mythical extract of the Soviet literature in the mentioned era in order to find a semantic universal resembling an old-fashioned model
In addition, I would like to mark some derivatives of the most popular scenario in traditional society. In the current work, there are three incarnations of this plot. This mythical scenario shows the central event of the epoch and its turning point as an alternative to the revolution. Early Soviet poets accept and describe the revolution as instantaneous destruction of the old world and immediate creation of new things. That's why the model of myth consciousness, especially the cosmological plot, will actually be in the process of writing.
Source: http: //proletcult.narod.ru/
0 comments:
Post a Comment